Storieta
English
Save & sign up

About this book

The work is a series of six lectures delivered by Bertrand Russell in Boston in the spring of 1914, in which he sets out to demonstrate the scope and limits of a logical‑analytic method for philosophy. Opening with a declaration that philosophy must become a science independent of personal taste, Russell frames his discussion around the problem of how the raw data of sense relate to the space‑time‑matter framework of mathematical physics, a problem he attributes to his collaborator Alfred North Whitehead. He promises to illustrate his method through concrete examples, contrasting the “classical tradition” of Kant and Hegel, the evolutionist strand derived from Darwin, and the emerging “logical atomism” that he champions. The lecture plan, outlined in the contents, moves from a critique of prevailing tendencies to detailed examinations of logic, continuity, infinity, and causation, all aimed at showing how a rigorously analytic approach can resolve long‑standing philosophical disputes.

Russell’s voice is that of an early‑twentieth‑century analytic philosopher, precise yet conversational, weaving together historical critique, technical exposition, and occasional references to unpublished insights from contemporaries such as Ludwig Wittgenstein. The style is scholarly but accessible, assuming familiarity with the major philosophical currents of the nineteenth century while introducing the newer logical tools that were reshaping the discipline. Readers who enjoy rigorous philosophical argumentation, especially those interested in the foundations of knowledge, the interplay between logic and physics, or the historical development of analytic philosophy, will find this text rewarding. It also appeals to students of the history of ideas who wish to see how Russell and his peers sought to replace grand metaphysical systems with a method grounded in logical analysis.

Who appears in this book

  • Bertrand RussellMiddle‑aged British gentleman, bald head, trimmed moustache, round spectacles, dark suit, scholarly demeanor
  • Alfred North WhiteheadElderly English scholar, white hair and beard, high‑collared waistcoat, thoughtful expression, academic robes
  • Ludwig WittgensteinYoung Austrian intellectual, sharp cheekbones, dark short hair, crisp shirt, contemplative gaze

The opening · free to read

The following lectures[1] are an attempt to show, by means of examples, the nature, capacity, and limitations of the logical-analytic method in philosophy. This method, of which the first complete example is to be found in the writings of Frege, has gradually, in the course of actual research, increasingly forced itself upon me as something perfectly definite, capable of embodiment in maxims, and adequate, in all branches of philosophy, to yield whatever objective scientific knowledge it is possible to obtain. Most of the methods hitherto practised have professed to lead to more ambitious results than any that logical analysis can claim to reach, but unfortunately these results have always been such as many competent philosophers considered inadmissible. Regarded merely as hypotheses and as aids to imagination, the great systems of the past serve a very useful purpose, and are abundantly worthy of study. But something different is required if philosophy is to become a science, and to aim at results independent of the tastes and temperament of the philosopher who advocates them. In what follows, I have endeavoured to show, however imperfectly, the way by which I believe that this desideratum is to be found.

[1] Delivered as Lowell Lectures in Boston, in March and April 1914.

The central problem by which I have sought to illustrate method is the problem of the relation between the crude data of sense and the space, time, and matter of mathematical physics. I have been made aware of the importance of this problem by my friend and collaborator Dr Whitehead, to whom are due almost all the differences between the views advocated here and those suggested in The Problems of Philosophy.[2] I owe to him the definition of points, the suggestion for the treatment of instants and "things," and the whole conception of the world of physics as a construction rather than an inference. What is said on these topics here is, in fact, a rough preliminary account of the more precise results which he is giving in the fourth volume of our Principia Mathematica.[3] It will be seen that if his way of dealing with these topics is capable of being successfully carried through, a wholly new light is thrown on the time-honoured controversies of realists and idealists, and a method is obtained of solving all that is soluble in their problem.

[2] London and New York, 1912 ("Home University Library").

[3] The first volume was published at Cambridge in 1910, the second in 1912, and the third in 1913.

The speculations of the past as to the reality or unreality of the world of physics were baffled, at the outset, by the absence of any satisfactory theory of the mathematical infinite. This difficulty has been removed by the work of Georg Cantor. But the positive and detailed solution of the problem by means of mathematical constructions based upon sensible objects as data has only been rendered possible by the growth of mathematical logic, without which it is practically impossible to manipulate ideas of the requisite abstractness and complexity. This aspect, which is somewhat obscured in a merely popular outline such as is contained in the following lectures, will become plain as soon as Dr Whitehead's work is published. In pure logic, which, however, will be very briefly discussed in these lectures, I have had the benefit of vitally important discoveries, not yet published, by my friend Mr Ludwig Wittgenstein.

Since my purpose was to illustrate method, I have included much that is tentative and incomplete, for it is not by the study of finished structures alone that the manner of construction can be learnt. Except in regard to such matters as Cantor's theory of infinity, no finality is claimed for the theories suggested; but I believe that where they are found to require modification, this will be discovered by substantially the same method as that which at present makes them appear probable, and it is on this ground that I ask the reader to be tolerant of their incompleteness.

Cambridge, June 1914.

The book keeps going

Keep reading, and see it illustrated

Reading is free forever. Sign up and watch scenes appear while you read.

Illustrated scene from The Adventures of Sherlock HolmesIllustrated scene from FrankensteinIllustrated scene from The Great Gatsby

Scenes Storieta drew for other classics.

New illustrated classics

A new classic, drawn, in your inbox.

Once or twice a month: the latest books to get full character casts, scene art, and free comic editions. No account needed.