Storieta
English
Save & sign up

About this book

George Grote’s third‑edition volume presents a scholarly survey of Plato’s dialogues that feature Socrates and his circle of companions. The work opens with a dense, line‑by‑line commentary on the Alkibiades passages, where Socrates refuses to give direct answers, instead guiding the young Athenian through a series of questions that expose the confusion between the expedient and the just. From there Grote moves through the Hippias and Hipparchus‑Minos sections, tracing how Plato’s dialectical method repeatedly forces interlocutors to confront their own ignorance about virtue, law, and the good. Throughout, the author interweaves textual analysis, historical context, and comparative notes on Xenophon’s Memorabilia, constantly emphasizing the unfinished or “inferior” status of certain dialogues while arguing for their pedagogical value in illustrating Socratic humility and the search for knowledge.

The tone is that of a 19th‑century academic: formal, meticulous, and heavily footnoted, with a clear reverence for classical scholarship. Readers who enjoy detailed exegesis of Platonic texts, especially those interested in the interplay between Socratic questioning and the moral concepts of justice, beauty, and law, will find Grote’s methodical approach rewarding. It appeals to students of ancient philosophy, historians of Greek thought, and anyone who appreciates a rigorous, historically grounded exploration of Plato’s early dialogues.

Who appears in Plato and the Other Companions of Sokrates, 3rd ed. Volume 2

  • SokratesElderly Greek philosopher, bald head, long white beard, simple white chiton, thoughtful expression
  • AlkibiadesYoung Athenian aristocrat, curly dark hair, handsome features, fine linen robe, confident posture
  • HippiasMiddle‑aged sophist, trimmed beard, sharp eyes, ornate himation, scholarly demeanor

The opening · free to read

Exorbitant hopes and political ambition of Alkibiades 2

Questions put by Sokrates, in reference to Alkibiades in his intended function as adviser of the Athenians. What does he intend to advise them upon? What has he learnt, and what does he know? ib.

Alkibiades intends to advise the Athenians on questions of war and peace. Questions of Sokrates thereupon. We must fight those whom it is better to fight--to what standard does better refer? To just and unjust 3

How, or from whom, has Alkibiades learnt to discern or distinguish Just and Unjust? He never learnt it from any one; he always knew it, even as a boy 4

Answer amended. Alkibiades learnt it from the multitude, as he learnt to speak Greek.--The multitude cannot teach just and unjust, for they are at variance among themselves about it. Alkibiades is going to advise the Athenians about what he does not know himself 5

Answer farther amended. The Athenians do not generally debate about just or unjust--which they consider plain to every one--but about expedient and inexpedient, which are not coincident with just and unjust. But neither does Alkibiades know the expedient. He asks Sokrates to explain. Sokrates declines: he can do nothing but question 6

Comment on the preceding--Sokratic method--the respondent makes the discoveries for himself ib.

Alkibiades is brought to admit that whatever is just, is good, honourable, expedient: and that whoever acts honourably, both does well, and procures for himself happiness thereby. Equivocal reasoning of Sokrates 7

Humiliation of Alkibiades. Other Athenian statesmen are equally ignorant. But the real opponents, against whom Alkibiades is to measure himself, are, the kings of Sparta and Persia. Eulogistic description of those kings. To match them, Alkibiades must make himself as good as possible 8

But good--for what end, and under what circumstances? Abundant illustrative examples 9

Alkibiades, puzzled and humiliated, confesses his ignorance. Encouragement given by Sokrates. It is an advantage to make such discovery in youth 10

Platonic Dialectic--its actual effect--its anticipated effect--applicable to the season of youth 11

Know Thyself--Delphian maxim--its urgent importance--What is myself? My mind is myself ib.

I cannot know myself, except by looking into another mind. Self-knowledge is temperance. Temperance and Justice are the conditions both of happiness and of freedom 11

Alkibiades feels himself unworthy to be free, and declares that he will never quit Sokrates 12

Second Alkibiades--situation supposed ib.

Danger of mistake in praying to the Gods for gifts which may prove mischievous. Most men are unwise. Unwise is the generic word: madmen, a particular variety under it ib.

Relation between a generic term, and the specific terms comprehended under it, was not then familiar 13

Frequent cases, in which men pray for supposed benefits, and find that when obtained, they are misfortunes. Every one fancies that he knows what is beneficial: mischiefs of ignorance 14

Mistake in predications about ignorance generally. We must discriminate. Ignorance of what? Ignorance of good, is always mischievous: ignorance of other things, not always ib.

Wise public counsellors are few. Upon what ground do we call these few wise? Not because they possess merely special arts or accomplishments, but because they know besides, upon what occasions and under what limits each of these accomplishments ought to be used 15

Special accomplishments, without the knowledge of the good or profitable, are oftener hurtful than beneficial 16

It is unsafe for Alkibiades to proceed with his sacrifice, until he has learnt what is the proper language to address to the Gods. He renounces his sacrifice, and throws himself upon the counsel of Sokrates ib.

Different critical opinions respecting these two dialogues 17

Grounds for disallowing them--less strong against the Second than against the First 18

The supposed grounds for disallowance are in reality only marks of inferiority ib.

The two dialogues may probably be among Plato's earlier compositions 20

Analogy with various dialogues in the Xenophontic Memorabilia--Purpose of Sokrates to humble presumptuous young men 21

Fitness of the name and character of Alkibiades for idealising this feature in Sokrates ib.

Plato's manner of replying to the accusers of Sokrates. Magical influence ascribed to the conversation of Sokrates 22

The purpose proclaimed by Sokrates in the Apology is followed out in Alkibiades I. Warfare against the false persuasion of knowledge 24

Difficulties multiplied for the purpose of bringing Alkibiades to a conviction of his own ignorance 25

Sokrates furnishes no means of solving these difficulties. He exhorts to Justice and Virtue--but these are acknowledged Incognita 26

Prolixity of Alkibiadês I.--Extreme multiplication of illustrative examples--How explained ib.

Alkibiadês II. leaves its problem avowedly undetermined 27

Sokrates commends the practice of praying to the Gods for favours undefined--his views about the semi-regular, semi-irregular agency of the Gods--he prays to them for premonitory warnings 28

Comparison of Alkibiadês II. with the Xenophontic Memorabilia, especially the conversation of Sokrates with Euthydemus. Sokrates not always consistent with himself 29

Remarkable doctrine of Alkibiadês II.--that knowledge is not always Good. The knowledge of Good itself is indispensable: without that, the knowledge of other things is more hurtful than beneficial ib.

Knowledge of Good--appears postulated and divined, in many of the Platonic dialogues, under different titles 31

The Good--the Profitable--what is it?--How are we to know it? Plato leaves this undetermined ib.

The book keeps going

Keep reading, and see it illustrated

Reading is free forever. Sign up and watch scenes appear while you read.

Illustrated scene from FrankensteinIllustrated scene from The Great GatsbyIllustrated scene from Pride and Prejudice

Scenes Storieta drew for other classics.

New illustrated classics

A new classic, drawn, in your inbox.

Once or twice a month: the latest books to get full character casts, scene art, and free comic editions. No account needed.