Public-domain ebook

The Roman assemblies from their origin to the end of the Republic

Name: The Roman assemblies from their origin to the end of the Republic
Author: George Willis Botsford

by George Willis Botsford

Read now Add to library

Language: en11,053 downloads on Project Gutenberg

Subjects

Rome -- Politics and government Constitutional law -- Rome

In: History - Ancient·Politics

Public-domain ebook sourced from Project Gutenberg #68419.

About this book

George Willis Botsford’s work is a scholarly investigation of Rome’s political institutions from the city’s earliest days through the collapse of the Republic. The opening pages launch into a meticulous discussion of the term populus, tracing its uncertain etymology and its evolution from a collective of families and military participants into the formal citizen body defined by Roman jurists. From there Botsford moves to the three primitive tribes, examining mythic origins, the interplay of Sabine and Etruscan influences, and the methodological challenges of reconstructing early Roman structures. He proceeds to the curiae, detailing their religious, social, and political functions, and carefully disentangling modern misconceptions about their composition. Throughout, the author relies on a dense network of ancient sources and contemporary scholarship, presenting a tightly argued narrative that foregrounds the artificial yet enduring nature of Rome’s early civic divisions.

The book reads like a classic early‑20th‑century academic monograph, with a formal, footnote‑laden style that assumes a reader comfortable with Latin terminology and the historiography of Roman constitutional development. Its tone is analytical rather than narrative, focusing on definitions, comparative ethnology, and the critique of earlier interpretations. Scholars of ancient law, students of Roman political history, and readers interested in the structural foundations of the Republic will find Botsford’s detailed exposition both rigorous and rewarding.

The opening · free to read

This volume is the first to offer in monographic form a detailed treatment of the popular assemblies of ancient Rome. Necessarily much of the material in it may be found in earlier works; but recent progress in the field, involving a reaction against certain theories of Niebuhr and Mommsen affecting the comitia, justifies a systematic presentation of existing knowledge of the subject. This task has required patient labor extending through many years. The known sources and practically all the modern authorities have been utilized. A determination to keep free from conventional ideas, so as to look at the sources freshly and with open mind, has brought views of the assemblies not found in other books. The reader is earnestly requested not to reject an interpretation because it seems new but to examine carefully the grounds on which it is given. In general the aim has been to follow a conservative historical method as opposed to the radical juristic, to build up generalizations on facts rather than to estimate sources by the criterion of a preconceived theory. The primary object of the volume, however, is not to defend a point of view but to serve as a book of study and reference for those who are interested in the history, law, and constitution of ancient Rome and in comparative institutional research.

In the preparation of the volume, I have been generously aided by my colleagues in Columbia University. To Professor William M. Sloane, Head of the Department of History, I owe a great debt of gratitude for kindly sympathy and encouragement in the work. It is an especial good fortune that the proofs have been read by Professor James C. Egbert. Many improvements are due to his scholarship and editorial experience. Professor George N. Olcott has advised me on various numismatic matters, and I am indebted to Dr. John L. Gerig for information on two or three etymologies. The proofs have also been read and corrections made by Dr. Richard R. Blews of Cornell University. It is a pleasure to remember gratefully these able friends who have helped me with their special knowledge, and to add the name of Mr. Frederic W. Erb of the Columbia University Library, whose courtesy has facilitated the borrowing of books for the study from other institutions.

Notwithstanding every effort to make the work accurate, mistakes and inconsistencies will doubtless be found in it, and I shall thankfully welcome suggestions from any reader for its further correction and improvement.