The quest of the historical Jesus: a critical study of its progress from Reimarus to Wrede

About this book

Albert Schweitzer’s work is a scholarly critique of the “Quest for the Historical Jesus,” tracing the development of that inquiry from the early skeptics Reimarus and Bruno Bauer through the German theological tradition that culminated in his own analysis. The opening pages set the tone by confronting the uneasy gap between traditional Christian doctrine and the modern historian’s demand for factual clarity, warning readers that the most influential biographies of Jesus have often been driven by hostility rather than impartiality. Schweitzer positions himself among those who, despite their “unflinching desire to attain historical truth,” are unafraid to wield the sharp phrases of their predecessors, using them to illuminate the evolving picture of a “protean and kaleidoscopic” figure. He promises a rigorous examination of the Gospel’s original context, insisting that any true understanding must be rooted in first‑century realities rather than twentieth‑century spiritual aspirations.

The book reflects the early‑20th‑century German theological style, dense, polemical, and richly allusive, yet it is rendered in clear English prose that retains Schweitzer’s passionate voice. Readers who appreciate rigorous historical‑critical methods, enjoy intellectual debates over the intersection of faith and scholarship, and are comfortable with a somewhat confrontational tone will find this study rewarding. It is especially suited to scholars of biblical history, theology students, and anyone interested in the intellectual forces that have shaped modern conceptions of Jesus.

Opening lines

_Every one nowadays is aware that traditional Christian doctrine about Jesus Christ is encompassed with difficulties, and that many of the statements in the Gospels appear incredible in the light of modern views of history and nature. But when the alternative of __“__Jesus or Christ__”__ is put forward, as it has been in a recent publication, or when we are bidden to choose between the Jesus of history and the Christ of dogma, few except professed students know what a protean and kaleidoscopic figure the __“__Jesus of history__”__ is. Like the Christ in the Apocryphal Acts of John, He has appeared in different forms to different minds. __“__We know Him right well,__”__ says Professor Weinel._(1)_ What a claim!_ …

Keep reading free · chapter 1 needs no account