Public-domain ebook
Language: en2,498 downloads on Project Gutenberg
Subjects
In: Punch·Humour·History - British
Public-domain ebook sourced from Project Gutenberg #23881.
The History of “Punch” is a scholarly study of the nineteenth‑century British satirical weekly, assembled by Marion Harry Spielmann. The author opens by critiquing earlier accounts, Hodder’s “Memories,” Hatton’s “Mr. Punch’s Origin and Career,” and Hatton’s “True Story”, and then explains his own methodical approach, built on extensive correspondence with former staff, friends, and relatives of the paper’s founders. Spielmann details the breadth of his research, noting the use of private family papers, legal documents, and letters from figures such as Thackeray, while also emphasizing his independent verification before consulting the current proprietors. The introduction promises a systematic, chapter‑by‑chapter examination of Punch’s birth, its editorial and artistic personnel, and its political influence, supported by numerous illustrations and an extensive index.
Written in a measured, Victorian scholarly voice, the work combines exhaustive documentation with a narrative that reads like a learned memoir of the era’s press. Its dense footnotes, formal diction, and reliance on primary sources will appeal to historians of journalism, literary scholars interested in 19th‑century British culture, and readers who enjoy detailed institutional histories rather than light‑hearted biographies.
The opening · free to read
PREFACE.
The prevailing idea of the origin and history of Punch has hitherto rested mainly on three productions: the "Memories" of George Hodder, "Mr. Punch's Origin and Career," and Mr. Joseph Hatton's delightful but fragmentary papers, entitled "The True Story of Punch." So far as the last-named is based upon the others, it is untrustworthy in its details; but the statements founded on the writer's own knowledge and on the documentary matter in his hands, as well as upon his intimacy with Mark Lemon, possess a distinct and individual value, and I have not failed to avail myself in the following pages of Mr. Hatton's courteous permission to make such use of them as might be desirable.
During the four years in which I have been engaged upon this book, my correspondents have been numbered by hundreds. Hardly a man living whom I suspected of having worked for Punch, but I have communicated with him; scarce one but has afforded all the information within his knowledge in response to my application. Editor and members of the Punch Staff, past and present--"outsiders," equally with those belonging to "the Table"--the relations and friends of such as are dead, all have given their help, and have shown an interest in the work which I hope the result may be thought to justify. All this mass of material--all the evidence, published and unpublished, that was adduced in order to establish certain points and refute others--had to be carefully sifted and collated, contrary testimony weighed, and the truth determined. Especially was this the case in dealing with the valuable reminiscences imparted by Punch's earliest collaborators, still or till lately living. Of undoubted contributors and their work, it may be stated, more than two hundred and fifty are here dealt with. A further number cheerfully submitted to cross-examination on one or other of the many subjects touched upon; and probably as many more were approached with only negative results.
My special thanks are due to Mrs. Chaplin, the daughter of the late Mr. Ebenezer Landells, who unreservedly placed in my hands all the Punch documents, legal and otherwise, accounts, and letters, concerning the origin and early editorships of Punch, which have been preserved in the family; and to Messrs. Bradbury and Agnew, who have supplemented these with similar assistance, as well as with books of the Firm establishing points of literary interest not hitherto suspected, together with the letters of Thackeray which illustrate his early connection with and final secession from the Staff. Apart from their general interest, these documents, taken together, establish the facts of such very vexed questions as the origin and the early editorships of Punch. This is the more satisfactory, perhaps, by reason of the numerous unfounded claims--or founded chiefly on family tradition or filial pride and affection--which are still being made on behalf of supposed originators of the Paper. Even these partisan historians, it is believed, will hardly be able to resist the proofs here set forth; although attested fact does not, with them, necessarily carry conviction. For such services, and for their ready and sympathetic acquiescence in the requests I have made for permission to quote text or reproduce engraving, my hearty thanks to Messrs. Bradbury, Agnew and Co. are due. To them and to all my numerous correspondents I here repeat the assurance of gratitude for their courtesy which I have privately expressed before.
I have reproduced no more pictures from Punch than were rendered necessary by the topics under discussion. I would rather send the reader, for Punch's pictures, to the ever-fresh pages of Punch itself. Nor, I may add, did I seek information and assistance from its Proprietors until this book was well advanced, preferring to make independent research and to test statements on my own account.
My primary inducement to the writing of this book has been the interest surrounding Punch, the study of which has not begotten in me the hero-worship that can see no fault. How far I have succeeded, it rests with the readers of this volume to decide.
September, 1895. M. H. SPIELMANN.
(From the First Sketch by Charles H. Bennett.)]
CONTENTS.
The book keeps going
Reading is free forever. Sign up and watch scenes appear while you read.
Scenes Storieta drew for other classics.
New illustrated classics
Once or twice a month: the latest books to get full character casts, scene art, and free comic editions. No account needed.
